• This web application logs your IP address. By visiting this site, you agree to our privacy policy.
    For the best experience on your mobile device, turn your device or check out the desktop version where you can use wider browser windows.
    Submission
    12 days left
    Evaluation
    Starts May 27
    Closed
    Oct 15

    Announcement of Opportunity: Science opportunities on Uncrewed Autonomous Free Flying Platforms in Low Earth Orbit

    Apply now to ESA’s Exploration Science Announcement of Opportunity on Uncrewed Autonomous Free Flying Platforms in Low Earth Orbit

    Q&A session presentation available at this link  

    ESA's Exploration Science Programme: Advancing Knowledge, Inspiring Innovation  

    The European Space Agency's (ESA) Exploration Science element, a cornerstone of its Explore2040 strategy, invites scientists, researchers, and innovators to join us in pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and technological capabilities. Our programme uniquely balances exploration-focused science, essential for enabling future human missions beyond Earth, with exploration-enabled science that leverages our capabilities for groundbreaking research across disciplines.  

    From the microgravity environment of low Earth orbit to the dusty plains of Mars, we offer unparalleled opportunities to conduct cutting-edge research. Our comprehensive approach spans multiple destinations - including the International Space Station, future commercial LEO platforms, the lunar platforms, the Moon's surface, and Mars - providing a diverse array of research environments and challenges.  

    Guided by core European values of collaboration, scientific excellence, and responsible exploration, we seek proposals that not only advance our understanding of the universe but also contribute to solving global challenges here on Earth. Our programme emphasises open science, international cooperation, and the inspiration of future generations. ESA Exploration Science Programme offers a platform to turn your scientific vision into reality.   

    Through this Research Announcement, we invite you to become part of Europe's journey into space, contributing your expertise to a programme that balances scientific rigour with exploration's grand challenges. Together, we will forge new paths in space exploration, expanding human knowledge and capabilities for the benefit of all. 

    INTRODUCTION

    ESA invites the submission of scientific proposals for research to be executed on uncrewed free flying platforms in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This Announcement of Opportunity (AO) aims to enable high quality scientific investigations making use of microgravity and the space environment, specifically targeting scientific proposals in the fields of Biology and Physical Sciences.

    The AO targets the use of small and medium size payloads suitable to execute the intended research on board uncrewed autonomous platforms, including CubeSats and larger free flyer vehicles.

    The opportunity is open to research topics addressing both exploration focused and exploration enabled science domains.

    To balance innovation, feasibility, and timely implementation, this AO follows a two-step selection process.

    OBJECTIVE OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY

    This AO aims to solicit research proposals, primarily in the fields of Biology and Physical Sciences that align with the ESA Explore 2040 Strategy (Annex 1). 

    The ESA Explore2040 strategy implements two streams of science:

    1. Exploration-focused science addresses the needs of ESA in order to meet its exploration objectives. Any research generating knowledge or achieving outcomes required to inform decisions relating to ESA exploration missions, studies, technology developments, operations and strategy fits into this category.
    2. Exploration-enabled science leverages the capabilities of the existing ESA platforms to conduct excellent science. 

    Proposals submitted in the framework of this AO can present research related to Exploration-Focused Science Themes, Exploration-Enabled Science Themes, or both.

    Important considerations for this AO:

    • The proposals shall be scientifically excellent and technically implementable for flight on LEO uncrewed autonomous platforms;
    • Proposals shall provide evidence for proposed protocol requirements  ( e.g tests in the lab, literature data) to justify the viability of the experiment
    • Applicants shall  demonstrate the resources and expertise capabilities  to support the mission.

    ESA will provide the resources for implementing the mission and specific hardware needed to execute selected proposals.

    UNCREWED AUTONOMOUS PLATFORMS IN LEO - GUIDELINES

    Complementary to the ISS research conducted in LEO, ESA is exploring future opportunities to carry out scientific experiments on alternative platforms. Naturally, these environments differ significantly from the ISS and other crewed facilities. Below is an overview of the main differences, constraints, and typical performance characteristics.

    • Microgravity level is expected to be in the order of 0.1 10-3 g up to 5x10^-6g, which is needed for a wide range of scientific experiments.
    • Autonomous execution: free flyers operate without the need for human intervention, as they are designed to be uncrewed and fully automatic.
    • Environment: The flexibility of accommodating in both pressurized and unpressurized environments broadens the scope of potential experiments. Exposure to the space environment detectors, or exposing samples, may be possible.
    • Safety: As an uncrewed platform, safety requirements are typically less stringent than crewed platforms. However ground safety requirements may turn more stringent than the ones in orbit due to chemicals and biological handling and preparation at associated launch site locations.
    • Sample return:  Based on the type of platform (e.g., recoverable), there will be the possibility of retrieving samples and payloads.
    • Mission resources: Compared to ISS, autonomous platforms are limited in size and resources (mostly power). Experiments that target those platforms shall consider such limitations.
    • Telemetry and downlink: Realtime monitoring, commanding, and data downlink capabilities are expected to be limited. Payloads shall therefore rely primarily on autonomous operations, onboard data storage, and, where relevant, onboard data reduction or processing to accommodate constrained telemetry and downlink resources.

    Constraints of the opportunity

    • Uncrewed missions that will be executed fully autonomously
    • Limited late access towards the launch vehicle and early retrieval after splashdown. 
      • Late access: Consider five days before a launch is attempted, plus an additional two-three days before the payload will be ready to implement the experiment in flight. During this time, it may be difficult to control temperature and power may not be available.
      • Payloads shall assume nonpowered late access as the default. Powered upload may be permitted only in exceptional cases and will be evaluated by ESA on a case-by-case basis.
      • Return of samples, if needed, after the flight may take several weeks or even months. Stowage conditions should be clearly defined. If there is no valid reason to return the samples, they will not be necessary available for return.
    • Mission Duration will not exceed two months. Longer-term missions may be a possibility without sample return.
    • Can be either pressurized (temperature range within the platform: 18–30°C) or unpressurized. The temperature range gives an indication of how much resources payloads need to allocate for providing suitable temperature conditions for the experiment
    • Experiment concepts proposed for this opportunity should demonstrate maturity and supporting evidence for implementing the scientific protocol
    • No glovebox will be made available – experiments must be run fully autonomously
    • No cold stowage facility on board (this implies that when cold stowage is needed, this must be accommodated by the payload, including during the download phase where power is limited )
    • Hard mounted across the whole mission instead of soft stowed on board ISS. It means that sensitivity of the sample to vibration shall be accounted for (e.g., g-vector orientation constraints)

    CLASSES OF PROPOSALS

      Two classes of proposals are foreseen under this AO:

       Class-S Small mission opportunity Research

      • Dimension Constraints: typically up to 4U (each unit-U is 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm) with power less than 20 W, 8 kg

      This class is particularly suited for:

      • Compact, self-contained experiments.

      Class-M Medium mission opportunity Research

      • Dimension Constraints: typically ~50 W, ~40 kg depending on platform

      This class is intended for:

      • Instruments with strong scientific merit but higher mass and power

      APPLICATION PROCESS 

      Submit your proposal by clicking “Submit Your Idea” and filling in all sections of the submission form and uploading supplementary information where indicated.   

       

       

       

      ELIGIBILITY

      The scientific institution for which the coordinator of a proposal is affiliated must be located in one of the ESA member or associated member states participating in ESA’s European Exploration Envelope Programme (E3P) — namely Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Luxemburg, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom. Scientists from other ESA Member States, as well as from non‑ESA Member States, may join proposals as team members. 

      Scientists from other ESA Member States that do not contribute to the Exploration Programme and scientists from other European countries having a cooperation agreement with ESA are encouraged to enquire with their national space organisation about the conditions for their participation in proposals to ESA. Furthermore, applicants will need to provide confirmation that they have informed their national agency/delegation before submitting their proposal.  A list of contact points is provided in the List of Points of Contact.  

      Step 1 – Idea Proposal

      Applicants shall submit a short Idea Proposal, describing:

      • Scientific objectives and relevance to LEO uncrewed platforms.
      • Payload concept and intended class (Small or Medium)- if possible;
      • Preliminary definition of needed resources (volume, mass, power, data, support for sensitive biological samples) - if possible;
      • Provision of flight heritage and associated mission, if applicable;
      • Protocol
        • Preflight campaign: what reference or verification tests need to be performed? Where are they conducted?
        • Mission definition: temperature constraint, late access need, samples, runs, data generated, duration
        • Postflight campaign: samples delivery constraints

      Step 1 - Evaluation

      Idea Proposals will undergo a peer review process and technical review focusing on:

      • Scientific Merit

        • Significance (50%): Does the proposed study address an important problem or challenge indicated within AO? Is there a clear, well- grounded and elaborated scientific justification and motivation provided in the proposal? Does the proposed research lead to an advance which is incremental or paradigm shifting?
        • Approach (35%): Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Will the experiment yield statistically robust results and if not, is it justified? Does the applicant acknowledge scientific risks and suggest mitigation? Has a data management plan been provided? Is the requested platform mandatory for the proposed study, or can other (laboratory) means be used before using this platform?
        • Knowledge translation (15%): Will the results of the research provide a benefit to Earth or for space exploration? Will the results (or other aspects related to the experiment) have a sustained impact on research in the future?
        • Personnel and Environment (Pass/fail): Are there sufficient and appropriate personnel dedicated to the project?

        Each proposal will receive an overall scientific merit score between 0 and 100 points, corresponding to the weighted average of the above-mentioned criteria. The proposals will receive one of the following marks:

         ratings_updated.png 

        Only proposals receiving a scientific merit score of Very Good or higher (score of 81 or higher) will be selected for implementation. Furthermore, a minimum score of Good or higher (score of 71 or higher) or a pass for pass/fail criteria is needed for each individual criterion. This is to ensure the selection of balanced proposals across the scientific merit criteria. 

        Technical Evaluation Criteria

        • Relevance (Pass/fail): Can the objectives and protocol be effectively achieved within the capabilities and limitations of the platform? Is there a demonstrated necessity for utilizing the chosen research platform? For calls related to the space station, does the proposal justify why the experiment cannot be conducted on the ground? Will the proposed research significantly benefit from the unique conditions offered by the selected platform? Does the proposed research align with ESA's Exploration Science strategy and address the specific questions outlined in the call for proposals? 
        • Programmatic Assessment (Pass/fail): To ensure efficient program implementation within a defined timeline, project selection will be balanced with available resources and program capabilities. ESA will choose projects from each Announcement of Opportunity (AO) based on existing research pools and work plan. Furthermore, to foster inclusivity and equal opportunities within Exploration Science, ESA encourages the submission of diverse proposals. This includes promoting balanced collaborations among institutions and scientific communities from all ESA Member States, ensuring representation across early-career and senior scientists, as well as gender diversity.
        • Preliminary Technical Feasibility Assessment (Pass/fail): Each proposal will undergo an internal, preliminary pass/fail technical and operational feasibility assessment. This assessment will be done either prior to or in parallel with the peer review process. This assessment aims to determine the proposal's compatibility with the capabilities of the chosen research platform, evaluate the technical, operational, and development complexity of the required hardware and activities, and identify the resources necessary for successful project implementation.
        Following approval of the proposed selection, the proposers will be individually informed of the outcome of the review in a confidential letter. This will include the report of the scientific peer review with overall scoring and programmatic assessment. The results of the selection will be final and not open to appeal. A positive selection may still require adjustments to enhance scientific return and optimize feasibility. 

      Following this review, ESA will select approximately 10 proposals, to proceed to Step 2.

      The second‑step proposal will focus on delivering a detailed experiment protocols, including  demonstrations of robustness for all identified open points or areas requiring further maturation to confirm the experiment’s viability.

      This phase will benefit from the support of ESA personnel, who will assist as needed to further develop and consolidate the aspects that require additional detail until the submittal of the proposal.

      Step 2 – Detailed technical Proposal

      Applicants selected for Step 2 shall submit a Detailed Proposal, including:

      • Full scientific justification and objectives;
      • Detailed technical description of the experiment
      • Description of previous flight missions ( =if any)
      • Experiment plan and schedule;
      • Operational concept;
      • Applicants will be given a period of 3 months to submit the detailed technical proposal. During this period, ESA will be available for support and guidance to determine robust requirements, if needed.

      Step 2 Evaluation

      Idea Proposals will undergo a peer review process and technical review focusing on:

      • Scientific merit and relevance usually by the same reviewers as in step #1;
      • Assess technical feasibility and maturity;
      • Evaluate compatibility with potential free flying platforms;
      • Identify risks and mitigation strategies.

       

      FINAL SELECTION

      The final selection of an estimated 3 to 5 payloads to be implemented will be based on:

      • Scientific merit, as assessed through by external peer reviewers;
      • Technical feasibility, including platform compatibility, by ESA experts;
      • Readiness and realism of the implementation plan;
      • Maximization of programme resources.

      ESA will select a final list of payloads for implementation within the available programme envelope between 2028-2030

       

      CONTRIBUTION TO ESA'S HRE Archiving 

      DATA: Raw and calibrated data shall be provided by the Science Team to ESA. The aim is to allow for the archival of a complete and meaningful investigation dataset at ESA. The data deliverables from the Science Team to ESA shall be provided in open and readable formats (not requiring special or proprietary tools to read them), unless otherwise is agreed with the HRE Science Data Centre. HRE Data Archive 

      For archiving purposes, the science team will need to create a Data Blank Book following experiment implementation (see Annex 3. for a template).

      BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES: For life science experiments, we encourage to consider protocols where it is possible to biobank subsets of samples, or a subset of samples that have been processed. Please see Annex 2. for standard operating procedures for the biobanking of biological samples that need to be considered. Any biobanked sample will be made available to the wider scientific community in the future, with reference and acknowledgement of the original science team

       IMPORTANT NOTES

      • Experiments previously deselected from ISS implementation due to programme constraints are encouraged to apply under this AO, provided they are technically compatible with uncrewed autonomous platforms and remain subject to the same peerreview standards and selection criteria.
      • Submission of an Idea Proposal does not guarantee selection for Step 2.
      • ESA reserves the right to adapt the number of selected proposals based on programme constraints.
      • Platform identification will be part of the ESA final assessment and allocation will depend on technical compatibility and availability.

      IMPORTANT DATES 

      AO Publication: 01/04/2026

      Q&A session :  21/04/2026 (Q&A Session Link from 14h

      Deadline for AO Responses: 27/05/2026  

      ESA Shortlist selection and Feedback to Respondents: end of June 2026 


      For the Shortlisted proposals:

      Detailed Proposal Preparation: From 01/07/2026 to 15/10/2026

      Closure of 2nd Phase: 15/10/2026

      Final Notification on Selection: NET mid-February 2027

      Background Information

      Innovation Area

      Human and Robotic Exploration

      ESA’s Terrae Novae exploration programme is leading Europe’s human journey into the Solar System using robots as precursors and scouts. Exploring space is about travelling farther and coming back with new experiences and knowledge to help us on Earth. Humankind will benefit from the new discoveries, ambitions, science, inspiration and challenges. 

      What's your idea?

      We appreciate all input. Even rough ideas can fuel a discussion and help to ideate. Help us to improve by submitting your own ideas to this campaign.